{"id":783,"date":"2017-01-09T15:15:06","date_gmt":"2017-01-09T14:15:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.simra-h2020.eu\/?page_id=783"},"modified":"2020-01-08T10:17:00","modified_gmt":"2020-01-08T09:17:00","slug":"simra-case-studies","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/www.simra-h2020.eu\/index.php\/simra-case-studies\/","title":{"rendered":"SIMRA Case Studies"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

SIMRA Case Studies collect and analyse empirical evidence of social innovations in agriculture, forestry and rural development in marginalised rural areas in selected European, Associated and non-EU countries, particularly focusing on the Mediterranean region. A co-constructed evaluation of success factors for social innovations in selected case studies will be carried out not only by the academic community, but also by the people involved in rural development practice (such as technicians, LEADER groups, etc.), covering spatial variation and heterogeneity of regions (e.g. in terms of natural conditions, socio-economic development, social capital, governance and institutional settings).<\/p>\n

Data collection takes place between winter and autumn 2018. The analyses at case study level and across cases will be implemented during 2019.<\/p>\n

The case studies that have been selected among those compiled in the database of social innovations constitute the \u201cAnalytical cases\u201d\u00a0<\/span>(A). These implement the whole set of SIMRA methodological tools:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
N.<\/strong><\/td>\nCase Study<\/strong><\/td>\nThematic cluster<\/strong><\/td>\nLocation and country<\/strong><\/td>\nPartner<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1<\/td>\nForest fire volunteers<\/a><\/td>\nForest Management<\/td>\nCatalonia, Spain<\/td>\nCTFC<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nLochcarron Community Development Company<\/a><\/td>\nStrathcarron, Scotland, UK<\/td>\nHUTTON<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nThe Noidanlukko cooperative<\/a><\/td>\nLocal Development<\/td>\nPyh\u00e4joki, Finland<\/td>\nOULU<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nPro Val Lumnezia<\/a><\/td>\nSurselva, Switzerland<\/td>\nUBERN<\/a> & SAB<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\nRevitalising plans for Vlkol\u00ednec<\/a><\/td>\nVlkol\u00ednec, Slovakia<\/td>\nCETIP<\/a>&IFESAS<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\nHawaruhof<\/a><\/td>\nCommunity Agriculture<\/td>\nKirchberg am Wagram, Austria<\/td>\nAWI<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\nLearning-Growing-Living with women farmers<\/a><\/td>\nSocial Farming<\/td>\nTrentino Alto-Adige, Italy<\/td>\nEURAC<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\nCare farm Pitteperk<\/a><\/td>\nKoudekerke on Walcheren, The Netherlands<\/td>\nDLO<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\nDairy producers public-private partnership<\/a><\/td>\nNetworking<\/td>\nEl Jem, Hazeg and Beni Hassen, Tunisia<\/td>\nFAOSNE<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\nVAZAPP\u2019<\/a><\/td>\nFoggia, Apulia, Italy<\/td>\nUNIFG<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
11<\/td>\nA box of sea<\/a><\/td>\nFisheries<\/td>\nLesvos and Leros Islands, Greece<\/td>\nICRE8<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Along with the \u201cAnalytical cases\u201d, Case Studies B or \u201cAnalytical-Informative Case Studies\u201d complement the pool of data through the complete methodology or a simplified version it for the assessment of social innovation. These cases are:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
N.<\/strong><\/td>\nCase Study<\/strong><\/td>\nThematic cluster<\/strong><\/td>\nLocation and country<\/strong><\/td>\nPartner<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1<\/td>\nSmart Carbon forestry in the Ravnic-Orlov\u0161e forest commons<\/a><\/td>\nForest Management<\/td>\nVipava valley ,Slovenia<\/td>\nCETIP<\/a>&IFESAS<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nSmart Carbon forestry in N\u00edzle Tatry forest commons<\/a><\/td>\nN\u00edzke Tatry, Slovakia<\/td>\nCETIP<\/a>&IFESAS<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nIntegrated ecosystemic value-enhancement of the Guadeloupe Forest Agrobiodiversity<\/a><\/td>\nGuadeloupe, France<\/td>\nHUTTON<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nNational Forum for Social Agriculture<\/a><\/td>\nSocial Farming<\/td>\nRome, Italy<\/td>\nEURAC<\/a> & UNIPD<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\nCommunity hydropower in Braemar<\/a><\/td>\nEnergy<\/td>\nBraemar, Scotland, UK<\/td>\nRDC<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\nCommunity hydropower in Braemar<\/a><\/td>\nCommunity Agriculture<\/td>\nBoxtel, The Netherlands<\/td>\nDLO<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\nNetwork R\u00e9seau des Fleurons<\/a><\/td>\nLocal Development<\/td>\nNeuch\u00e2tel, Switzerland<\/td>\nUBERN<\/a> & SAB<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Lastly, Cases C or \u201cInformative Case Studies\u201d are additional examples of Social Innovation which have employed a simplified version of the SIMRA methodology. These examples are of interest for providing robustness to the findings from Cases A and B, as well as addressing new topics of social innovation in rural areas. These cases are:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
N.<\/strong><\/td>\nCase Study<\/strong><\/td>\nThematic cluster<\/strong><\/td>\nLocation and country<\/strong><\/td>\nPartner<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1<\/td>\nCommunity work with wildfire volunteers<\/a><\/td>\nForest Management<\/td>\nPened\u00e8s-Garraf County, Catalonia, Spain<\/td>\nCTFC<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nValorisation of Non-Wood Forest Products through the Market Analysis and Development (MAD) approach<\/a><\/td>\nJendouba and Beja Governorates, Tunisia<\/td>\nFAOSNE<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nArgan co-operative of rural women<\/a><\/td>\nNetworking<\/td>\nIdmine, Souss Massa Region, Morocco<\/td>\nFAOSNE<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nEnvironmental Friendly Villages Network<\/a><\/td>\nNetworking<\/td>\nBehera Governorate, Egypt<\/td>\nCU<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\nCommunity energy: Huntly District Development Trust<\/a><\/td>\nEnergy<\/td>\nHuntly, Scotland, UK<\/td>\nRDC<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\nResilience of Rural Islands<\/a><\/td>\nLocal Development<\/td>\nVidovici, Cres Island, Croatia<\/td>\nCETIP<\/a> & IFESAS<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

  SIMRA Case Studies collect and analyse empirical evidence of social innovations in agriculture, forestry and rural development in marginalised rural areas in selected European, Associated and non-EU countries, particularly focusing on the Mediterranean region. A co-constructed evaluation of success factors for social innovations in selected case studies will be carried out not only by…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.simra-h2020.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/783"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.simra-h2020.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.simra-h2020.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.simra-h2020.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.simra-h2020.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=783"}],"version-history":[{"count":66,"href":"http:\/\/www.simra-h2020.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/783\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3777,"href":"http:\/\/www.simra-h2020.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/783\/revisions\/3777"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.simra-h2020.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=783"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}